× Welcome to the Kunena forum! Tell us and our members who you are, what you like and why you became a member of this site. We welcome all new members and hope to see you around a lot!
The enthusiasm of a developer may be completely irrelevant
2 years 3 months ago #53501 by Sagelucy
"It was really not OSRS gold earning any profits, but we'd spent a lot of time and effort at this point that there were a lot of people taking part," said Andrew Gower in one of the book's many interviews. "It was thrilling to watch 2,000 to 3,000 players enjoying the game at once, loads of people chatting on forums, and everyone was enjoying RuneScape. I just wanted to make it. It was good fun, even if it didn't make a profit".

This is the reason we let the free membership levels remaining - they did not want to lose the members. We know that it definitely worked, and the game's popularity only increased. However, it's important to note that, as The First 20 Years explains, RuneScape didn't reach its highest levels without making a few mistakes during the course of its development.

The majority of us who played the game daily during the 2000s were likely to struggle to master the first ever release that is now known as RuneScape Classic. Players could attack anyone even their opponents. The graphics were beyond simple. It could only hold 1,200 players at a time without going down.

Gaming isn't permitted to make mistakes now. Titanfall 2 isn't getting the funds it requires to fix its online play on PC. Anthem was scrapped during the course of the major overhaul. Fable Legends was scrapped before it had even been able to launch. The game is now either have to play Fortnite or you'll die trying.

The enthusiasm of cheap RuneScape gold a developer may be completely irrelevant to a publisher's, too. Dragon Age 4 has been removed twice because of more powerful interference constantly dictating the game's direction. Metal Gear fans who clearly want one-player games, purchased the co-op title Metal Gear Survive in 2018. This isn't even to discuss the subsidiary games Activision Blizzard wastes on constant Call of Duty development.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.